During the Tokugawa
period there were laws against portraying real people either historical or
contemporary. That is why the actor in this print plays a fictitious
character named Akechi Mitsuhide, but in reality is the historical figure
Takechi Mitsuhide. Not much of a stretch there, but obviously enough to get
by the censors of their time.
There is a triptych
from ca. 1791 by Shun'ei in the Buckingham Collection of the Art Institute
of Chicago --- ex-collection of Frank Lloyd Wright --- which includes an
actor as Takechi Mitsuhide. In the entry on these prints Timothy Clark
notes: "Kanagaki Muromach Bundan was a version of Taikōki, the
famous historical saga of the assassination in 1582 of the dictator Oda
Nobunaga by his retainer Akechi Mitsuhide, who in turn was quickly destroyed
by Nobunaga's general Toyotomi Hideyoshi. Since plays dealing with such
relatively recent events were forbidden, the names of the characters were
thinly disguised."(1)
But why would the
authorities want to proscribe artistic productions of such events? Think
about it. Nobunaga was killed by one of his underlings and cohorts. While
this doesn't rise to the level of regicide it comes damn near. Mary
Elizabeth Berry said: "Despite his claims upon fame and his shocking end,
Nobunaga died unlamented. A man who had lived by the sword with uncommon
ferocity and immersed Japan in a bloodbath it would never forget, he came,
by most accounts, to a suitable reckoning. The prevailing distaste for the
man emerged in sympathetic expositions of Akechi Mitsuhide's motives for
treachery."(2) That's right: Mitsuhide had his motives and from a historical
distance they seem rather sound. One of them involved the death of his
mother as an act of revenge ordered by Nobunaga. "By the end of the
eighteenth century, the popular theater reflected a consensus on Nobunaga's
villainy when it allowed his assassin this speech of exoneration: 'Heedless
of remonstrations, Nobunaga destroyed shrines and temples, daily piling up
atrocity upon atrocity. It was my calling to slay him for the sake of the
Warrior's Way, for the sake of the realm.... Both in our country and in
China, the murder of a lord who does not know the Way has been the task of
great men who thus give relief to the people.' "(3)
Great men who give
relief to the people?! This monologue alone would pose a threat to whomever
was the sitting shogun at the time and hence would call for proscription.
But the times had changed by the late 18th century and things were getting
by the censors which would have been nipped in the bud long before they made
it to the stage. |