There are numerous
illustrations found in catalogues of different versions and/or
editions of specific prints by Hiroshige. His "Sudden Shower at Atake" is a
case in point. Variations in coloring, the view of and treatment of the
far shore, the use of bokashi, etc., all provide practical lessons in
connoisseurship. I even own one catalogue in Japanese that gives side by
side examples of Kuniyoshis from divergent printings. There can be nothing
more instructive.
Great Western institutions
like the Morgan Library in New York and the Museum of Fine Arts have mounted
comprehensive exhibitions of Rembrandt prints which run the gamut from the
first state of the first edition to the late and tired examples of the
posthumous ones. There is a thrill which comes with the recognition of what
makes one earlier and the other later. It hones the eye and intellect.
What makes this Eisen print so important to me is the
fact that I was already offering the same image from the same blocks, but
from an earlier edition. How can you tell? It isn't the colors. Coloring was
often strengthened to compensate for the loss of fine detail. Therefore it
has to do with the quality of line. Compare the lines of the faces of the
kamuro on the right looking up at the courtesan in both prints. The lines of
the face of the kamuro on this page seen above have begun to break down and
lack the crispness of the example below. Another good gauge is found in a
comparison of the border lines of the cartouche found in the upper right of
each print. The differences are striking. |